Saturday, December 19, 2015

ELECTION 2016 TIDBITS TO REMEMBER 12-19-15

The following are facts. You decide if these guys deserve your vote in 2016 or 2018 when they run for mayor or council again.

Here is who on the current council voted AGAINST my constitutional right to have an advertising bench on city hall property. (in other words, this is the list who voted ILLEGALLY)

1. Current Mayor Greg Zylka (up for election 2018)
2. Councilor Loren Boyum Ward 1 Southeast side
3. Council President Jeremy Hanfler (Ward 3 west side and up for election 2016)
4. Councilor Frank Gosiak Ward 3 west side(up for election 2018) (former mayor Cathy VanRisseghems brother)


Now here is who voted AGAINST my constitutional right to have my current seasonal display on city park property. (In other words, they voted ILLEGALLY.)

1. Councilor Loren Boyum
2. Alderman Brad Hircock represents all wards and up for re-election in 2018 (Coborns Pharmacy manager and Mayor Greg Zylka is his boss.) 
 

Remember ALL the councilors(Leif Hanson, Jeremy Hanfler, Greg Zylka, Gerald Knafla, Wayne Liljegren, Frank Gosiak and Brad Hircock), except Loren Boyum(he was absent, but likely would have voted to deny also), voted to DENY my permanent display on city property. If it turns out that vote violated my right to feee speech, you know who is guilty.


There is a whole lot more, but for now, this is the most important information you need to know to make an informed voting decision. 

These are the councilors that voted FOR the roach development, that may have been illegal....time will tell, the lawsuit will be heard shortly at Morrison County Courthouse. 

1. Mayor Greg Zylka
2. President Jeremy Hanfler
3. Councilor Frank Gosiak
4. Councilor Gerald Knafla
5. Alderman Brad Hircock
6. Councilor Leif Hanson

These 2 voted AGAINST THE ROACH DEVELOPMENT.

1. Councilor Wayne Liljegren
2. Councilor Loren Boyum

So far, in my opinion Wayne Liljegren (Ward 2) is the only one who has voted consistently with the law and the constitution(but that's only IF council DIDN'T violate my right to free speech on either the seasonal or temporary display request I made).

 (I believe the Roach Developers and the city violated law). Time will tell.

No comments:

Post a Comment