And why shouldn't the public be able to watch live work session meetings, as well as council. Taxpayers pay their salary and taxpayers bought the new videorecording equipment. Taxpayers should be able to monitor their performance while they are performing their jobs representing their constituents. Right?? Just what are they hiding? Notice how Zylka says tgere would be a lot of cons anout allowing viewers to see their live work sessions. Hircocks argument of "people can attend the work sessions if they want" flies in the face of good judgement AND full transparency. Why only livebroadcast part of their meetings? The real nitty gritty work during the meeting BEFORE council meeting, is MORE important than council meeting itself. There's absolutely no reason the residents shouldn't be able to view all meetings from the comfort of their own homes.
And who is it that made the technical errors in the minutes that Raquel Lundberg caught? Wendy Zylka, of course.....the mayors wife....so when the mayor says he called the errors in earlier to get them corrected, he could just as well say " I called my wife to tell her to correct her mistakes."
The sign discussion was interesting. I am paying attention.
And since council did not require food and liquor vendors to pay a fee to sell their products at the "Big Dig" large scale events, now technically the Chamber can't legitimately charge food/beverage vendors a fee to sell their products during the craft show. City's going to get their can in hot water legally again,because of this "pick and choose" mentality they have. Just wait til some vendors find out they've been treated differently than other vendors.
https://youtu.be/y2cJiDQJiJI
No comments:
Post a Comment